Chesham Conservation Area appraisal consultation
Contents
Our recent review of the Chesham Conservation Area sets out the background to the town's historical development and looks in detail at how this heritage is reflected in the town as we know it today. Our review proposes five boundary changes to the conservation area, seeking to preserve and enhance the town's heritage as it has developed through time, including in the modern era.
The five proposed boundary changes are listed below, and we'd like your opinions on them. There is also the opportunity to comment on a number of further minor boundary adjustments that are intended to make the boundary more logical.
Please respond to us on as many or as few of the boundary proposals as you wish.
We'd also like to hear your general comments on the revised appraisal and management plan.
It's also very helpful for us to have information on who is responding, so we'd much appreciate it if you could also complete the 'about you' section, whether you're responding as an individual or on behalf of an organisation.
Map showing proposed conservation area boundary changes
| Page | Response |
|---|---|
| 1. Proposed addition to the conservation area: Lowndes Park and Bury Pond | 0 of 1 questions answered |
| 2. Proposed addition to the conservation area: Thomas Harding School and Housing in Wey Lane | 0 of 1 questions answered |
| 3. Proposed addition to the conservation area: Meades Water Gardens, Red Lion Street | 0 of 1 questions answered |
| 4. Proposed addition to the conservation area: Waterside | 0 of 1 questions answered |
| 5. Proposed removal from the conservation area: Sainsbury’s car park, off of the High Street | 0 of 1 questions answered |
| 6. Minor boundary adjustments | 0 of 1 questions answered |
| General comments on the draft appraisal and management plan | 0 of 1 questions answered |
| About you | 0 of 3 questions answered |
| More about you (if you're responding as an individual) | 0 of 5 questions answered |
| About your organisation (if applicable) | 0 of 2 questions answered |