We asked, you said, we did

Below are some of our recent activities and their outcomes.

We asked

We asked for views on the introduction and harmonisation of fees associated with mobile home site licensing.

The consultation ran from 30 June to 24 August 2025.

You said

We received eight responses to the consultation:

  • none of the respondents disagreed with the proposal to harmonise the approach to mobile home site fees across the whole council area
  • none of the respondents disagreed with the methodology used when setting the proposed fees
  • five out of the eight respondents either strongly agreed or agreed with the proposed level of fees, two either strongly disagreed or disagreed

View the consultation analysis report (PDF 0.16MB).

We did

On Tuesday 23 September 2025, Licensing Committee agreed to adopt the Mobile Homes Site Licensing Fees Policy with effect from 1 October 2025.

We asked

We asked for views on whether you agreed with opening a Communication and Interaction (Autism) Unit at Iver Village Junior School. 

The consultation ran from 25 June to 5 August 2025.

You said

We received 10 responses to the consultation: 

  • 7 online survey responses 
  • 3 email and postal responses 

On the proposal to open a new Communication and Interaction (Autism) Unit, of the 10 who responded: 

  • 9 (90%) were in agreement with the proposal; 1 (10%) did not agree; 0 (0%) didn’t know 
  • 10 (100%) said that they understood why the proposal had been made 

We did

Together with the Governing Board of Iver Village Junior School, we have considered the responses to the consultation. 

In view of the need for SEND provision and having taken into account all responses received, on 12 September 2025 we published a statutory proposal to open a Communication and Interaction (Autism) Unit at Iver Village School. 

We asked

It is a legal requirement for the Buckinghamshire Health and Wellbeing Board, in common with the other Health and Wellbeing Boards across the country, to draw up a new Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) every three years to ensure that the pharmacy network in the area is meeting the needs of those that live and work there.  

The statutory consultation on the new PNA was preceded by a survey in which we asked residents and other individuals about their experience of using pharmacies in Buckinghamshire. 

Overall, the feedback to the survey was very positive. Of the 197 respondents, all but one reported a satisfactory or good experience with accessing pharmacy services. 

The information gained in the survey was used to inform the next stage of development of the PNA, which then went out to statutory consultation from 14 May to 13 July 2025. 

You said

In total six people responded to the consultation via email or via our consultation survey, they represented:  

  • four members of the public 

  • Oxfordshire County Council 

  • Boots UK limited 

The responses were positive, and are presented in the consultation report which is published as Appendix D of the adopted PNA

We did

Responses to the consultation were considered by the PNA steering group before the PNA went forward to the Buckinghamshire Health and Wellbeing Board. It was adopted for publication at a meeting on 18 September 2025

View the adopted Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2025-2028

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing PSPO in Aylesbury Town Centre should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 35 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 35 who responded: 

  • 24 agreed; 6 disagreed; 5 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 35 who responded: 

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • 33 agreed; 1 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 
  • public urination and defecation 
    • 34 agreed; 1 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • acting in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress 
    • 34 agreed; 1 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • begging or appearing to be begging or any public performance for the purpose of begging 
    • 31 agreed; 3 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 
  • failure of owner or person in control to remove dog faeces 
    • 31 agreed; 2 disagreed; 2 didn’t know 
  • placing of temporary structures for the purpose of habitation 
    • 28 agreed; 4 disagreed; 3 didn’t know 

Respondents, including Aylesbury Town Council, suggested the following areas should also included in the PSPO: 

  • Vale Park as nuisance activities in the town centre often move into the park 
  • Jansel Square 

It was suggested the following activities are removed as they are covered by other legal orders or are subjective and therefore not easily enforced: 

  • failure of owner or person in control to remove dog faeces 
  • parking without permission or authority on the public realm of Kingsbury and Market Square 
  • acting in a manner that causes of is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress 

It was suggested the following activity be included in the PSPO as it causes a detrimental impact in the town centre: 

  • failure to remove temporary structures such as tents, caravans or vehicles, for the purpose of overnight stays when instructed by an officer 

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

The consultation feedback was considered and discussed with Thames Valley Police. As a result: 

  • Vale Park was added to the PSPO 
  • Jansel Square was not added due to the distance from the town centre and as there is insufficient evidence to support a PSPO at this time 
  • the activities included in the new order were updated to: 
    • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol  
    • public urination or defecation  
    • begging or appearing to be begging or any public performance for the purpose of begging 
      • the act of begging is deemed as either approaching people for money, or being stationary and asking directly for money or positioned on the floor to invite the offer of money or goods  
    • failing to remove at the direction of a Buckinghamshire Council authorised officer, Police Officer or Police Community Support Officer any temporary structure, tent, caravan, or vehicle for the purpose of an overnight stay or stays 

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to discharge the Aylesbury Town Centre PSPO and replace it with Buckinghamshire Council, Aylesbury Town Centre and Vale Park PSPO. 

Buckinghamshire Council, Aylesbury Town Centre and Vale Park PSPO  takes effect from 3 October 2025. 

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing Aylesbury Vale Parks and Open Spaces PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 25 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 25 who responded: 

  • 11 agreed; 6 disagreed; 8 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 25 who responded: 

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • 23 agreed; 2 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • using a mechanically propelled vehicle in a way that causes for is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress 
    • 25 agreed; 0 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 

It was suggested that Vale Park in Aylesbury be removed from this order and be added to the Aylesbury Town Centre Order.  

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

The consultation feedback was considered and discussed with Thames Valley Police.  As a result: 

  • Vale Park was removed from the PSPO 
  • activities in the new order were confirmed as: 
    • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • using a mechanically propelled vehicle in a manner that causes or is likely to cause nuisance or annoyance. Prohibited behaviour includes, but is not limited to sounding horns, revving of engines, driving in a manner which causes or likely to cause danger to themselves or others, damaging property or performing stunts 

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to discharge the Aylesbury Vale District Council PSPO and replace it with Buckinghamshire Council, Parks and Open Spaces PSPO. 

Buckinghamshire Council, Parks and Open Spaces PSPO takes effect from 3 October 2025. 

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing Chiltern Car Parks PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 32 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 32 who responded: 

  • 20 agreed; 5 disagreed; 7 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 32 who responded: 

  • using a mechanically propelled vehicle in a way that causes for is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress 
    • 29 agreed; 2 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 
  • using any part of the restricted area for skating, skateboarding, cycling or ball games in a way that causes or is likely to cause nuisance or annoyance 
    • 26 agreed; 4 disagreed; 2 didn’t know 

It was suggested that Walton Street car park, Aylesbury be included due to complaints from residents of anti-social behaviour relating to motor vehicles speeding, loud revving of engines and performing wheel spins, supported by feedback from partners. 

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

The consultation feedback was considered and discussed with Thames Valley Police. As a result: 

  • Walton Street car park was added to the PSPO 
  • King George V Road car park site was removed as it is now under private management 
  • activities in the new order were confirmed as: 
    • using a mechanically propelled vehicle in a way that causes or is likely to cause harassment alarm or distress. Prohibited behaviour includes, but is not limited to sounding horns, revving of engines, driving in a manner which causes or likely to cause danger to themselves or others, damaging property or performing stunts
    • using any part of the restricted area for skating, skateboarding, cycling, or ball games in a way that causes or is likely to cause nuisance or annoyance 

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to discharge the Chiltern Designated Car Parks PSPO and replace it with the Buckinghamshire Council, Designated Car Parks PSPO. 

Buckinghamshire Council, Designated Car Parks PSPO takes effect from 3 October 2025. 

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing Chiltern and South Bucks Alcohol Restriction PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025.

You said

We received 11 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 11 who responded: 

  • 4 agreed; 4 disagreed; 3 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 11 who responded: 

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • 5 agreed; 5 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 

Chesham Town Council and local councillors suggested the new PSPO extend beyond alcohol restrictions to include the same prohibitions proposed for Aylesbury and High Wycombe Town Centres. 

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

The consultation feedback was considered and discussed with Thames Valley Police. As a result, the activities included in the new order were updated to:

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
  • public urination or defecation  
  • begging or appearing to be begging or any public performance for the purpose of begging 
    • the act of begging is deemed as either approaching people for money, or being stationary and asking directly for money or positioned on the floor to invite the offer of money or goods 
  • failing to remove at the direction of a Buckinghamshire Council authorised officer, Police Officer or Police Community Support Officer any temporary structure, tent, caravan, or vehicle for the purpose of an overnight stay or stays 

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to discharge the Chiltern and South Bucks (alcohol consumption) PSPO and replace it with Buckinghamshire Council, Chesham and Amersham PSPO. 

Buckinghamshire Council, Chesham and Amersham PSPO takes effect from 3 October 2025.  

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 9 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 9 who responded: 

  • 7 agreed; 1 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 9 who responded: 

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • 6 agreed; 3 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • acting in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress 
    • 8 agreed; 1 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • consumption of any psychoactive substance (colloquially known as a legal high) or possessing a psychoactive in breach of an authorised officer’s request to surrender it 
    • 9 agreed; 0 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • using foul or abusive language or behaviour towards another person (whether on land or in the lake) which may reasonably be perceived to be threatening, aggressive or intimidating 
    • 8 agreed; 1 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • entering the lake in a manner which is reasonably likely to harm any other person in the water 
    • 9 agreed; 0 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 

It was suggested the following activities are removed from the proposed order as they are covered by other legal orders or are subjective and therefore not easily enforced: 

  • acting in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress 
  • the consumption of any psychoactive substance (colloquially know as a legal high) or possessing a psychoactive in breach of an officer's request to surrender it 
  • using foul or abusive language or behaviour towards another person (whether on land or in the lake) which may reasonably be perceived to be threatening, aggressive or intimidating 
  • entering the lake in a manner which is reasonably likely to harm any other person in the water

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

The consultation feedback was considered and discussed with Thames Valley Police.  As a result, the activities included in the new order were updated to: 

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to discharge the South Bucks District Council Dorney Lakes PSPO and replace it with Buckinghamshire Council, Dorney Lakes PSPO. 

Buckinghamshire Council, Dorney Lakes PSPO takes effect from 3 October 2025.  

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing High Wycombe Town Centre PSPO and Desborough Road PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 80 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 80 who responded: 

  • 49 agreed; 17 disagreed; 14 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 80 who responded: 

  • person(s) shall not engage, loiter or solicit with a view to engaging in obtaining sexual services 
    • 76 agreed; 0 disagreed; 4 didn’t know 
  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • 78 agreed; 0 disagreed; 2 didn’t know 
  • public urination and defecation 
    • 79 agreed; 0 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 
  • acting in a manner that causes or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress 
    • 79 agreed; 1 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • begging or appearing to be begging or any public performance for the purpose of begging 
    • 80 agreed; 0 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 
  • failure of owner or person in control to remove dog faeces 
    • 77 agreed; 2 disagreed; 1 didn’t know 
  • placing of temporary structures for the purpose of habitation 
    • 75 agreed; 3 disagreed; 2 didn’t know 

It was suggested Desborough Road area is removed as the activity is covered by other legal orders. 

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

The consultation feedback was considered and discussed with Thames Valley Police. As a result, the activities included in the new order were updated to: 

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
  • public urination or defecation 
  • begging or appearing to be begging or any public performance for the purpose of begging 
    • the act of begging is deemed as either approaching people for money, or being stationary and asking directly for money or positioned on the floor to invite the offer of money or goods 
  • failing to remove at the direction of a Buckinghamshire Council authorised officer, Police Officer or Police Community Support Officer any temporary structure, tent, caravan, or vehicle for the purpose of an overnight stay or stays  

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to: 

  • discharge the Desborough Road PSPO with effect from 3 October 2025 
  • discharge the High Wycombe Town Centre PSPO and replace it with Buckinghamshire Council, High Wycombe Town Centre PSPO 

Buckinghamshire Council, High Wycombe Town Centre PSPO takes effect from 3 October 2025. 

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing West End Road PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 16 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 16 who responded: 

  • 11 agreed; 5 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 16 who responded: 

  • restricting access to West End Road 
    • 16 agreed; 0 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to extend the West End Road PSPO. 

Buckinghamshire Council, West End Road PSPO is extended until October 2028. 

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing Winslow and Steeple Claydon PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 10 online responses to the consultation. 

On the proposal to expire the current order, of the 10 who responded: 

  • 3 agreed; 5 disagreed; 2 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 10 who responded: 

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • 9 agreed; 1 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council agreed to discharge the Winslow and Steeple Claydon Centre PSPO and replace it with Buckinghamshire Council, Winslow and Steeple Claydon PSPO. 

Buckinghamshire Council, Winslow and Steeple Claydon PSPO takes effect from 3 October 2025. 

We asked

We asked residents and other individuals about their experience of using pharmacies in Buckinghamshire. This was a preliminary exercise in the development of a new Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) for 2025 through to 2028. It is a legal requirement for the Buckinghamshire Health and Wellbeing Board, in common with the other Health and Wellbeing Boards across the country, to draw up a new PNA every three years to ensure that the pharmacy network in the area is meeting the needs of those that live and work there. 

The survey was open from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

A total of 197 people responded to the online survey. 

The majority of respondents chose their pharmacy because it was where their GP sends their prescriptions, was close to their home or work, or they were happy with the overall experience provided by the pharmacy. Nearly all respondents (96%) can reach their pharmacy in 20 minutes or less. No substantial differences or identified needs were found amongst protected characteristics groups in their pharmacy usage. 

An additional survey was distributed through Patient Participation Groups to gather insights into participants’ experiences with accessing pharmacy services, their expectations, and any further comments they wished to share. 101 people responded to that survey.  

Overall, the feedback was positive: all but one respondent reported a satisfactory or good experience with accessing pharmacy services. A few additional comments highlighted concerns about occasional stock shortages and pharmacies being under pressure due to the number of services they offer. 

View a detailed report on the survey feedback in Chapter 6 of the adopted PNA

We did

The information gained in the survey was used to inform the next stage of development of the PNA. The responses showed that there is good pharmacy coverage in Buckinghamshire, and people generally have access to the pharmaceutical services they need. 

The draft PNA then went out to statutory consultation with key stakeholders. There were six responses to the statutory consultation, indicating that there was a high level of stakeholder agreement with the findings of the PNA. 

The PNA was adopted at a meeting of the Buckinghamshire Health and Wellbeing Board on 18 September 2025

View the adopted Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2025-2028

We asked

Public Spaces Protection Orders (PSPOs) are aimed at ensuring public spaces can be enjoyed free from anti-social behaviour. They provide us with legal powers to deal with a particular nuisance or problem in a defined area.  

We asked for your views on whether the existing Buckingham Town Centre PSPO should be expired and a new one introduced.  

The consultation ran from 6 January to 16 February 2025. 

You said

We received 5 online responses to the consultation.  

On the proposal to expire the current order: 

  • 5 agreed; 0 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 

On the proposed activities associated with anti-social behaviours to be included in a new order, of the 5 who responded:  

  • consuming alcohol or being in possession of an open container of alcohol 
    • 2 agreed; 3 disagreed; 0 didn’t know 

Data provided by the Police does not indicate there are issues or anti-social behaviours associated with public place alcohol consumption. Buckingham Town Council had not recorded any incidents in the last 18 months.  

More information about the consultation responses. 

We did

On 25 September 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council discharged the Buckingham Town Centre PSPO with effect from 3 October 2025. 

We asked

We asked for your views about proposed changes to school admissions in Buckinghamshire for September 2026. 

These changes were: 

  • updates to the county admissions scheme and school admission rules (also known as oversubscription criteria) 

The consultation ran from 5 December 2024 to 31 January 2025. 

You said

Six people responded to us regarding the five schools changing their published admission numbers and the school extending its catchment area. The six people had mixed views on these changes.

Three of these people additionally responded to us regarding the updates to the county admissions scheme and school admission rules. One email was also received concerning admissions issues. 

We did

Although some respondents disagreed with some of the proposed changes to admissions numbers and catchment, the very low level of participation in the consultation, despite it being promoted, reflected the fact that the changes were minor and considered non-controversial. 

Because all the directly affected governing bodies were party to the decision to consult and agreed with the suggested changes, the very small number of expressions of disagreement in the consultation were not deemed to carry sufficient weight to affect these schools’ proposed changes. 

Similarly, the proposed updates to the county admissions scheme and school admission rules were very minor and attracted only three survey responses and one email in the form of comments. 

Some of the comments received addressed wider concerns than those changes that were being proposed. As the concerns expressed related to aspects of the admission rules that were not being proposed for change, they fell outside of the scope of this consultation. However, these responses will be taken into account when considering future changes. 

As a result of the overall small number of responses the decision was made to proceed with the proposed changes, and a decision was taken on 24 February 2025 by the Leader of the Council and the Cabinet Member for Education and Children’s Services to: 

  • adopt the proposed changes in the published admission numbers for five schools 

  • adopt the proposed change in the catchment area for Waddesdon Village Primary School 

  • confirm the county admissions scheme and school admission rules. 

We asked

We asked for your views on proposed changes to our Adult Social Care Day opportunities and overnight respite service.

The consultation ran for 15 weeks between 15 October 2024 and 31 January 2025. The consultation was due to close on 7 January 2025 but it was extended to allow more time for feedback.

You said

We received 660 responses to the consultation:

  • 464 online responses
  • 60 postal surveys
  • 136 email responses

We also received feedback from the events held:

  • 110 people attended face to face sessions
  • 15 people attended online events

The key findings from the consultation were:

  • 6% of respondents overall agreed with the proposed preferred option, 92% disagreed and 2% responded neutral
  • 38% of respondents overall agreed with investing in improvements to the centres proposed to remain open, 34% disagreed and 27% responded neutral
  • 7% of respondents overall agreed with the proposed preferred option to increase overnight external respite services and no longer deliver services at the Council-run overnight service, 73% disagreed and 20% responded neutral

Many people expressed concerns about possible changes, key issues raised were:

  • the location of in-house day centres in the preferred option
  • the impact on staff and quality of care for those affected by the preferred option
  • the impact of the preferred option on families and carers
  • the travel impact of the preferred option
  • ensuring sufficient overnight respite across the county
  • cost effectiveness of the preferred option

View the consultation findings report (PDF 2MB).

We did

The consultation responses were considered, and the recommended approach was different as a result. Key changes included:

  • keeping Seeley's House open to ensure a dedicated overnight respite facility remained in the south of the county of adults under 65
  • opening a new additional specialist overnight respite facility for adults under 65 in Aylesbury to provide better geographical coverage across the county to this type of specialist service

On 9 September 2025, Cabinet agreed the following recommendations:

  • the Council will run specialist support services for adults (ages 18–64) from four key locations: Aylesbury, Chesham, Spring Valley, and Seeley’s House
  • services at three centres—Buckingham, Hillcrest, and Burnham—will close, but everyone currently supported there will continue to receive suitable care at the Council’s retained centres or other suitable alternative provision elsewhere
  • a new additional overnight respite service will be set up in Aylesbury
  • a request for an additional investment of £0.942 is made to improve facilities at the Council’s retained centres
  • to seek a sale for the Burnham and Hillcrest Day Centre buildings through the council’s disposal process, including inviting community groups to purchase Burnham Day Centre, but defer open marketing of the Burnham Day Centre building for two months to allow community groups an opportunity to prepare a bid

Whilst Cabinet has agreed to the proposals, changes will not happen immediately. We are committed to working with service users, families and staff to carefully manage communications and ensure ongoing service delivery.

For more information, view the Cabinet reports.

We asked

We asked you for your views regarding the proposal to undertake landscaping improvements on White Hart Street, High Wycombe, under Phase Two of the ongoing regeneration works.

Our proposal was to remove three trees in the area: two outside Café Roberto and one outside TSB Bank/Guild Hall. This would also include the installation of three new trees outside the Café, with a number of small trees / large planters as well.

You said

We received 7 responses during this consultation with a even split between those who supported the proposals, and those who objected. The breakdown of these results is shown below:

  • Support - 3 (42.86%)
  • Oppose - 3 (42.86%)
  • Other comments - 1 (14.28%)

We did

A report was submitted to the Council with the recommendation to proceed with the removal of the three trees outside the Café and the Bank, with a decision arriving on 13th February 2025.

Link to the Officer Decision Report: Decision - White Hart Street Regeneration – Landscaping Improvements - Modern Council 

We asked

We asked for your views on the proposed 13 locations for electric vehicle charging bays in Wendover. The locations were chosen following an earlier consultation and in collaboration with the Wendover EV Working Group, which includes local councillors, Wendover Parish Council, and interest groups.  

You said

We received 54 responses to the survey: 

  • 52 online 
  • 2 via email 
  • 96% were from residents of Wendover 

Comments received included: 

  • general parking pressures 
  • positive views of EVs 
  • ownership of parking space 
  • impact on driveway access 

Details about the comments for each location. 

We did

As a result of the consultation, the Wendover EV Working Group agreed to remove 3 locations from the proposed plan: 

  • B4009 Aylesbury Road (outside no. 30) 
  • Bankside (rear of no. 23) 
  • Woollerton Crescent (outside no. 34) 

On 3 June 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council considered the responses and agreed to the 10 kerbside charging points and associated Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs) across Wendover.  

  • B4009 Aylesbury Road (outside no. 22) 
  • B4009 Aylesbury Road (outside no. 183)  
  • Babbington Road (outside no. 67) 
  • Boddington Road (adjacent to no. 23 Hampden Road) 
  • Halton Wood Road (outside no. 19 & 20) 
  • Nocton Hall Drive (outside no. 6) 
  • Scarlett Avenue (fronting flats no. 1-25) 
  • Tedder Road (outside no. 71 & 73) 
  • The Beeches (outside no. 50) 
  • Whittingham Avenue (outside no. 54) 

Authority was delegated to the Head of Highways to approve detailed design following public feedback and to authorise the installation of the EV charging points and making of the TROs. 

We asked

We asked residents and businesses for their views on introducing parking restrictions within the Elm Farm area of Aylesbury following an informal consultation.

You said

We received 56 responses during the statutory consultation. The list below shows the result breakdown per proposal:

  1. Double Yellow Lines (No Waiting at Any Time)
    • Ashford Road (27 Support, 15 Oppose and 14 were Not Sure)
    • Charmfield Road (29 Support, 15 Oppose and 12 were Not Sure)
    • Dalesford Road (28 Support, 13 Oppose and 15 were Not Sure)
    • Elm Farm Road (36 Support, 11 Oppose and 9 were Not Sure)
    • Hazelhurst Drive (34 Support, 11 Oppose and 11 were Not Sure)
    • Hillary Close (26 Support, 17 Oppose and 13 were Not Sure)
    • Lynwood Road (27 Support, 15 Oppose and 14 were Not Sure)
    • Mellstock Road (27 Support, 16 Oppose and 13 were Not Sure)
    • Pemberton Close (26 Support, 18 Oppose and 12 were Not Sure)
    • Waivers Way (30 Support, 13 Oppose and 13 were Not Sure)
  2. Limited Waiting Monday to Saturday 8am to 10pm, 4 hours No Return Within 4 hours
    • Elm Farm Road (32 Support, 15 Oppose and 9 were Not Sure)
    • Hazelhurst Drive (32 Support, 11 Oppose and 13 were Not Sure)
  3. Disabled Badge Holders Only
    • Mellstock Road (31 Support, 14 Oppose and 11 were Not Sure)
  4. No Stopping Monday to Friday between 8am and 5pm on Entrance Markings
    • Hazelhurst Drive (38 Support, 5 Oppose and 13 were Not Sure)
  5. Removal of 'No Stopping on Entrance Markings'
    • Hazelhurst Drive (27 Support, 12 Oppose and 17 were Not Sure)
  6. No Loading Monday to Saturday between 8am and 10am and 4pm to 7pm
    • Elm Farm Road (29 Support, 16 Oppose and 11 were Not Sure)
    • Hazelhurst Drive (28 Support, 15 Oppose and 13 were Not Sure)
  7. No Waiting Monday to Saturday between 8am and 10pm
    • Elm Farm Road (31 Support, 16 Oppose and 9 were Not Sure)
    • Hazelhurst Drive (28 Support, 17 Oppose and 11 were Not Sure)
    • Waivers Way (26 Support, 19 Oppose and 11 were Not Sure)

We did

Following the consultation, we compiled the responses and provided the summary to the Local Councillors (prior to the 2025 Local Elections).

A decision was to amend the following restrictions:

  1. Hazelhurst Drive - the proposed Limited Waiting was changed to: 'Limited Waiting Mon - Sat 8am-10pm 4hrs No Return Within 4hrs'
  2. Waivers Way - the proposed No Waiting restriction was changed to: 'No Waiting Mon - Fri 8am-9.30am and 2.30pm-4pm'

Buckinghamshire Council made a decision to make the Traffic Regulation Order for the proposals, including the amendments listed above. This decision was made in April 2025.

As of 10th October 2025, Buckinghamshire Highways are currently undertaking works to implement these restrictions. From 15th October 2025, the Traffic Regulation Order covering these restrictions will come into effect, replacing the expiring Temporary Traffic Regulation Order.

You can find the decision here: Decision - Elm Farm Estate, Aylesbury Parking Review - Modern Council.

We asked

Residents were asked for their views regarding the introduction of a number of parking restriction amendments along Maxwell Road, Beaconsfield, in relation to an upcoming development. In addition, we also proposed to introduce a ban on right - hand turns into / from the new development and the service road.

You said

The Consultation resulted in the following results:

  • 10 People responded
    • 70% supported the proposed movement restrictions (no right turn bans), with 30% opposing
    • 60% supported the proposed parking amendments, with 40% opposing

Objections received were mainly focused on the amendment of existing parking restrictions, as residents were concerned about the limited amount of parking currently available.

We did

A Key Decision Report was put together for the council to make a decision on whether to proceed with the proposals.

In April 2025, a decision was made, with the Council approving the recommendments set out in the report, which you can find here: Decision - Maxwell Road, Beaconsfield Traffic Regulation Orders - Modern Council

Furthermore, two Traffic Regulation Orders will be effective on 19th September 2025, with a Notice of Making advert being published on the following Friday (26th September 2025) via Bucks Free Press.

We asked

We asked for views on a statutory notice to open a Communication and Interaction (Autism) Unit at Overstone Combined School, Wing.

The representation period ran from 26 November to 23 December 2024.

This followed an initial consultation on the proposal from 30 September to 10 November 2024.

You said

We received 21 responses to the statutory notice, including:

  • 17 online responses
  • 4 by email or post

Of the 21 who responded, 18 (85.7%) agreed with the proposal to open a Communication and Interaction Unit, 3 (14.3%) did not agree and 0 (0%) didn’t know.

View more information on the representations received (PDF 0.16MB).

We did

Together with the Governing Board of Overstone Combined School, we have considered the representations we received.

On 12 February 2025, the Leader of Buckinghamshire Council approved the opening of a Communication and Interaction (Autism) Unit at Overstone Combined School.